Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2411 13
Original file (NR2411 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS:

701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No:NRO02411-13
22 April 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

uj A a aS
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420 Ser PERS-
4G/032 of 26 Sep 2013

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner did
not have a break in service while on Active Duty for Special
Work (ADSW) from 30 September 2012 to 11 November 2012.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and
George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure {2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner was honorably discharged from Active Duty
for Special Work (ADSW) on 11 November 2012 vice 30 September

2012.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOME
Recorder Acting Recorder

Bs Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e}))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

22 A il 2014
e 2 eS, re

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6953 13

    Original file (NR6953 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner did not have a break in service or change his Place Entered Active Duty (PLEAD) frot a : ¢° SS Se while on Active Duty for Special Work (ADSW) orders from 21 July 2009 to 15 January 2011. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3682 13

    Original file (NR3682 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner did not change his Place Entered Active Duty (PLEAD) from i> -- Se 30: 1. on Active Duty for Special Work (ADSW) from 28 October 2013 to 14 April 2014. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10483-06

    Original file (10483-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.Docket No. 10483-06RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12266-08

    Original file (12266-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Active Duty Special Work (ADSW) orders directing Petitioner to report to Port Hueneme, CA were issued prior to 19 September 2008 and authorize entitlement to an incentive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09213-07

    Original file (09213-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show authorization of ADSW orders for a period of 167 days to Kingston, Jamaica vice ADT orders.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on March 10, 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08274-01

    Original file (08274-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs Dunn, Neuschafer, and Petitioner’s allegations of error and iIi_justice on 14 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 8274-01 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Recorder G4== G. L....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01848-07

    Original file (01848-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1848-07 20 Mar 07From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj:REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORDRef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Temporary Active Duty (TAD) reserve orders issued as Active Duty for Training (ADT) were modifiedtoshow Active Dw~yfor Special Work {ADSW)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9104 13

    Original file (NR9104 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR735 14

    Original file (NR735 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to IT2/E-5 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2014 and, pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR540 14

    Original file (NR540 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to the pay-grade E-7/ISC, prior to her transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to...